Now that the Clippers’ 2020 season has reached its disappointing end, 213Hoops will work through the roster player-by-player for our “Exit Interview” series. Today’s exit interview features backup point guard Reggie Jackson.

Basic Information

Height: 6’3

Weight: 208 pounds

Position: Point guard

Age: 30

Years in NBA: 9

Regular Season Stats with Clippers: 9.5 points, 3.0 rebounds, 3.2 assists, and 0.3 steals in 21.3 minutes per game across 17 games (6 started) on 45.3/41.3/90.5 shooting splits.

Playoff Stats: 4.9 points, 1.8 rebounds, 0.9 assists, and 0.2 steals in 14.2 minutes per game across 12 games (1 started) on 43.8/53.1/0 shooting splits.

Contract Status: Unrestricted free agent


When the Clippers signed Reggie Jackson off the waiver wire, the expectations were that he’d take over the backup point guard role on the Clippers, and fill in as a spot starter for the inevitable Pat Beverley absences. While he was overpaid and frequently disappointing on the Pistons, he’d still been (mostly) a starter for around half a decade, making him a seemingly overqualified backup.

While Jackson’s predilections for sloppy play and poor defense were known, the thought was that a lesser role would enable Jackson to focus on scoring and limit his need to create for others. This would make him another scoring threat off an already potent Clippers bench, and allow him to play at least limited playoff minutes.

The contrasting expectation was that almost no waiver wire players ever truly help playoff teams, and that Jackson would be no different. While talented, he’s had issues with role and decision-making his whole career, and there wasn’t much evidence that he would be able to adjust on the Clippers.


Jackson’s Clipper tenure started off great. In the nine games he played before the Covid-19 shutdown in March, the Clippers went 7-2, and looked better than they had all season. While Jackson wasn’t the sole (or primary) cause of this run, he was legitimately a key piece on the Clippers team at that time. His numbers weren’t incredible, but he provided efficient scoring, helped take the playmaking and ball-handling load off of Lou Williams’ shoulders, and created a lot of dribble penetration that therefore led to ball movement. All was well.

Until it wasn’t. The first few games of the bubble were fine, but when Pat Beverley had to leave Orlando to attend to a personal matter, Jackson was pressed into starting duties, and it was clear how overmatched he was. The only thing he was successful at in the starting lineup was hitting spot up threes. His defense was poor, his decision-making on offense was worse, and he made some truly unforced turnovers at the worst moments. Clippers fans, who had warmed up to Jackson at the expense of the slumping Landry Shamet, quickly flipped their tune, and were soon calling for more minutes for the younger player.

However, while Jackson’s primary utility might have been as a guy to soak up regular season minutes, he was pressed into major duty in the playoffs after Beverley got injured in Game 1 against the Mavericks. He started Game 2, and while his numbers were fine, his poor defense saw him demoted for the rest of the series. That didn’t mean his minutes were reduced, though, as Jackson played over 20 minutes in Games 4-6. He was scorching from deep in those games, combining to shoot 11/18 from three, a ridiculous percentage given the volume. His performances in Games 4 and 5 were mostly fine, but Doc Rivers sticking him in for a final defensive possession in Game 4 (which resulted in Doncic burying a game-winning three against him) was a portent of poor coaching decisions to come.

Pat Beverley returned against the Nuggets, and Jackson’s role was slashed. After being a virtual non-entity in Games 1 and 2, he was reduced to a handful of minutes in Game 3. With the Clippers clearly in a dogfight, Doc Rivers cut Jackson out of the minutes, giving him just spot minutes in Games 4 and 6 and not playing him in Game 5 at all. In desperation, Doc turned to Jackson in Game 7, but he contributed nothing on offense while getting torched on defense, closing with a -9 in just over four minutes of playing time. And thus, Reggie’s season ended.

Future with Clippers

It’s honestly kind of difficult to predict what Jackson’s future with the Clippers might be. On one hand, he gave them some legitimately good regular season minutes, and was one of the few Clippers to actually hit threes in the postseason. On the other hand, he displayed that he’s not someone that can truly be counted on in a real postseason role, much less as a replacement starter. That makes re-signing him a very, very low priority.

Ultimately, if the Clippers do keep Beverley (which they probably will), they need a backup who is capable of starting or playing big minutes due to Beverley’s proclivity for injuries and foul trouble. Jackson is not that guy, and considering that other teams could offer him more money or a bigger role, he might want to leave anyway. Jackson is very close friends with Paul George (one of the reasons that he came to the Clippers), yet Kawhi Leonard showed frustration with his decision-making several times, and Kawhi’s opinion has to matter to the Clippers more than George’s.

Now, if either Lou Williams or Landry Shamet is traded, Reggie might be more likely to come back. His defense alongside those guys was untenable, and since Lou and Landry are better players, Reggie’s minutes were therefore more unbearable. If there are fewer poor backcourt defenders on the Clippers next season, it might be easier to carry Jackson. That said, his offensive decision-making might have been more frustrating, and removing Lou from the equation would put more onus on Jackson to create.

All in all, it seems unlikely that Reggie will be the Clippers’ primary backup point guard next year. If he’s not, he would be very overqualified for a third point guard role, and would certainly get more minutes elsewhere. That’s not even factoring in the presence of Terrance Mann, who the Clippers are grooming as a point guard, and who would be blocked from all minutes if another backup point guard joins Jackson and Mann on the roster. That makes me think that Jackson will probably not be on the Clippers next season. Or maybe it’s just wishful thinking.


  • Lucas Hann Lucas Hann says:

    The Clippers’ non-bird rights on Jackson mean they can pay him up to about 3M next year. He will probably get above-min offers elsewhere too, but if a capped out team (or just a team with limited resources) had a small trade exception or small expendable contract, it could be an opportunity for the Clippers to get some flexibility back in a sign-and-trade (they wouldn’t get an asset or useful player).

    • Robert Flom Robert Flom says:

      I have no idea what the market will be for Jackson (or anyone really). Do teams ignore his playoff woes? Or do they look at his shooting and think they have a place for him. Don’t know.

      I do know I’d rather he be elsewhere next season, and a sign and trade sounds great.

  • Avatar Thretch says:

    Early during his tenure, he was making some fantastic drives and finishing. But as the bubble and playoffs wore on, he was taking 1-on-2 fast breaks or driving into good defenders and wasting offensive opportunities. Is that what you mean by poor offensive decision making?

    • Robert Flom Robert Flom says:

      Pretty much yeah. The fastbreak decisions were particularly egregious, but he also just didn’t demonstrate strong playmaking ability in the halfcourt either.

      Essentially, I don’t trust him to run an offense at all. He’s really more of a Lou Williams type of player than a pure point – but a worse scorer and passer. That makes him pretty redundant.

      • Avatar mlslaw1 says:

        Think he’s a better spot up shooter than Lou. That talent comes in handy. Can he improve his decision making and be a better all around player? Only if he wants to and I don’t have have that answer.

        • Lucas Hann Lucas Hann says:

          Reggie, catch and shoot threes, 19-20 RS: 36-85, 42%
          Reggie, catch and shoot threes, 18-19 RS: 128-323, 39.6%
          Reggie, catch and shoot threes, 17-18 RS: 27-82, 32.9%

          Reggie, total over last 3 seasons: 191-490, 39%

          Lou, catch and shoot threes, 19-20 RS: 56-137, 40.9%
          Lou, catch and shoot threes, 18-19 RS: 43-117, 36.8%
          Lou, catch and shoot threes, 17-18 RS: 89-223, 39.9%

          Lou, total over last 3 seasons: 188-477, 39.4%

          Reggie is a good spot up shooter but he and Lou are pretty equal in spot-up efficiency. But, fwiw, Reggie does attempt catch and shoot threes at a much higher rate than Lou. My guess is that if Lou didn’t have the ball in his hands almost the entire time he was on the floor, he’d get more of those looks.

  • Avatar Goons 1 says:

    Decision making aside, can’t defend him there, it’s kinda hard to pin the lack of play making solely on him since there was no off ball movement or system in place.. This team was poorly coached & your 3 core “leaders” & holdovers from the past 2 seasons were bad to horrible, which didn’t help anyone! I was one who wanted him to get playing time, along with Pat Pat, in games 6 & 7 since they could at least shoot.. You can talk about their bad defense all day but bad offense constantly led to easy buckets on the other end all playoffs.. More so, in games 6 & 7 when you saw Kawhi slowing down due to fatigue or the wear & tear of playing every other day

    That said, would I like to see him back? I really can’t say as of this moment til we know who the coach is & what happens with Lou & Pat (whom I’d like to stay).. I’m def not on the fuck Reggie Jackson camp though

    • Lucas Hann Lucas Hann says:

      Definitely can’t blame the lack of playmaking solely on Reggie. It was bad when he was out of the rotation.

      But I think that the best teams have collections of players who are good decision-makers without really having glaring weak points. Miami and the Lakers may not have been stocked with tons of dynamic off-the-dribble creators, but had a lot of guys who didn’t make mistakes. Reggie is a guy who makes a lot of mistakes.

      • Avatar Goons 1 says:

        Oh I agree, I’ve seen most of the Pistons games in which Blake has played the past few seasons & I knew then he wasn’t the best nor smartest.. I just think the lack of on court chemistry mainly due to Pat, Lou & trez being out for significant time during the bubble affected the entire team.. Add docs terrible decision making & we got exactly what we saw, a complete disaster

        For what it’s worth, Rondo saved the lakers.. Let bron rest throughout the playoffs on both ends.. Consequently, you saw how much Miami was affected once they lost Goran.. Herro for as good as he played at times was pretty bad all around in the finals which made Jimmy have to carry the entire load

  • Avatar osamu6238 says:

    I also wouldn’t mind having Reggie back. Sure he wasn’t great in the playoffs, but neither were a lot guys on the Clippers. I feel like the bad overall play highlighted bad Reggie. Sure you wish you can have an elite ballhandler and defender for this position, but I’ll wait for someone to tell me who that is and how we get him before I say we shouldn’t bring back Reggie.