213hoops.com

Clippers vs Spurs Player Grades

LA Clippers San Antonio Spurs DeMar DeRozan Patrick Beverley

We’re back again with Clippers vs Spurs player grades after a disappointing loss for the Clippers, who really should have taken care of business against a Spurs team that is projected to finish near the bottom of the Western Conference. Like every other game this season, it was a contest of extreme highs and lows–LAC fell behind early, came back and took the lead near the end of the first, fell behind by 21 in the second quarter, tied the game at the end of the third, fell behind by 15 in the mid fourth, and clawed back enough to have three shots at winning the game or forcing overtime in the closing seconds.

As the Clippers have had their extreme highs and lows in this young season, and had their extreme highs and lows last night, so too will the player grades for this game have some extreme highs and lows. The question on my mind tonight, though, is how much to really blame guys for who they are. We know who Reggie Jackson is. We know who Lou Williams is. We know who Luke Kennard is. The team’s defense sucks when those three guys play together. Ty Lue doesn’t really have any options on nights when Paul George and Marcus Morris are both out (the reason he doesn’t have options is because the other bench guys are Terance Mann, who is an active defender with terrible positioning, and Patrick Patterson, who is an immobile defender who knows where he should be but can’t get there).

Clippers Starter Grades

Clippers Bench Player Grades

Clippers Without Grades

Paul George, Marcus Morris, and Jay Scrubb were all unavailable with injuries. Amir Coffey played briefly for a defensive possession at the end of the first quarter, while Mfiondu Kabengele and Daniel Oturu didn’t play tonight.

I won’t give Clippers head coach Ty Lue a grade, and I haven’t been grading him nightly all year, but I do want to touch a little bit on him here because I so frequently said above that players were being put in situations where you couldn’t reasonably expect them to succeed. A lot of folks might read that as pointing back towards a critique of coaching, which is fair, but not really how I feel about this game. Yes, of course, Ty put lineups out there that were a disaster defensively in the most predictable ways. But he also kind of had limited options.

Sure, maybe he could have staggered Beverley, Leonard, and Batum more effectively to keep two good defenders on the floor at all times. But just with the limitations of the roster he’s been given, that would have also meant having two liabilities on the floor at all times. The gamble he took was to try and survive horrible defense in his second unit shifts by loading up the firepower on that unit and keeping a solid defensive starting unit intact for the vast majority of the game. It didn’t pay off, in part because the bench was so atrocious defensively, in part because the Spurs didn’t miss any threes, in part because the bench firepower didn’t produce enough (30 LAC bench points vs 57 for SAS), and in part because the starting unit had several lackluster stretches. Everyone shares a bit in the failure, as it should be.

In reality, I just don’t think Ty had great options given to him. The Clippers have 11 players who can play 1-4. Five of them (Beverley, George, Leonard, Morris, Batum) are good defenders, and five of them (George, Leonard, Morris, Batum, Patterson) have the size to play the 3 and 4. You’ll notice the heavy overlap in that group. The Clippers have 1 small good defender, 5 small bad defenders, 4 big good defenders, and 1 big bad defender. Take away two of the big good defenders and you’re gonna end up stuck playing lineups that are both undersized and weak defensively. I’m not sure what Ty is supposed to do that.

The real failing grade here should go to LAC’s front office. We talked a lot about how LAC hit on the big moves this summer but made gaffes around the edges, and the lack of adequate depth that lost the Clippers this game is a direct result of those mistakes. I will be the first to admit that Reggie Jackson has far exceeded my expectations and played well individually so far this season, but he’s still a bad fit alongside Lou and Luke when the Clippers needed someone who was defensive-minded. Patrick Patterson has some (limited) utility as a shooter as I outlined above, but he’s also a bad fit because the team simply doesn’t have the defenders to protect him–and by inexplicably paying him over three million dollars, the team didn’t leave themselves enough room under the hard cap to fill the 15th roster spot. PatPat is essentially taking up two minimum-salary roster spots, and Ty Lue is playing 4-guard lineups ahead of him because of his defense. The team drafted big man Mfiondu Kabengele 27th last year, and he isn’t good enough to play emergency minutes at center. They also drafted Daniel Oturu 33rd this year, and he isn’t good enough to play emergency minutes at center. So on a roster limited to 14 players by the bad Patterson contract, the team is using two of those 14 spots on project bigs who they don’t even trust enough for third-string minutes.

You want to know why LAC can’t muster adequate defensive lineups on a night like tonight? It’s not because individual players are failing to live up to expectations, and it’s not because Ty Lue is playing the wrong combinations of guys. It’s because of the aforementioned series of errors in roster construction. It probably isn’t a big deal. When the Clippers are healthy, none of these guys will be playing anyway. But over the course of an NBA season, there was always going to be a night in the middle of the season with two starters out where you needed to be able to put together a serviceable lineup for the second quarter. We’ll probably get another tomorrow with Kawhi load managing on the back-to-back, and we’ll probably get a handful more here and there throughout the year. LAC’s FO didn’t plan well for them.